• React
  • Composition
  • Api Design

The Compound Component pattern

Close-up of a beautiful roman castle with a metallic copper coloured towers rooftops, concrete allure and dark blue interleaved with chatelle tiles.

Close-up of a beautiful roman castle with a metallic copper coloured towers rooftops, concrete allure and dark blue interleaved with chatelle tiles.
Art by Leonardo Diffussion: beautiful roman castle of lego bricks, composition, close-up.

Striking an acceptable level of composition is a challenging feat, not only does it take a good time to think about the feature you want to build but it also requires you to reason about and predict the use-cases the component will have to meet in the future.

Fortunately for us, there are multiple patterns in React that we can apply to increase the composability of our components. One that I really appreciate is the Compound Component pattern and its variations.

Compound Component

As a refresher on the Compound Component pattern, it lets you split out a component into extendable smaller components that you can compose to build interfaces.

Problems from friend of a friendExample of a real problem from Tom ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป, a SWE at WideOpenAIยฎ

Tom ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป is the happy maintainer of the Menu component:

<Menu items={menuItems} />

Just a simple component that renders a button to toggle a menu and its items. It's a very common component that you'll find in many UI libraries and you probably have a similar component in your codebase (so do I!).

But one day Tom's boss ๐Ÿคต๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ calls him:

๐Ÿคต๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ Hey, our clients are having trouble checking if they're logged in. Our top bar menu should reflect that.

๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป Sure thing, I'll get right to it!

Easy peasy! - says Tom ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป - I'll start by adding two new props to the Menu component to highlight the login status:

<Menu
  buttonLabel={loggedIn ? 'Signed in as Tom - Menu ' : 'Unlogged - Menu'}
  items={menuItems}
/>

And it all just works, he has a happy day and goes home.

But then you he gets another call from his boss:

๐Ÿคต๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ Hey, our users are having trouble finding the admin panel. I need you to highlight the admin option in the top bar menu.

๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป Alright!

๐Ÿคต๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ But it should only be highlighted when the user is an admin!

Let's just add another prop! โ€” Tom ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป.

<Menu
  buttonLabel={loggedIn ? 'Signed in as Tom - Menu ' : 'Unlogged - Menu'}
  isAdmin={isAdmin}
  items={menuItems}
/>

And it works again! Tom ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป is happy and his changes are deployed to the website. But then he gets another call:

๐Ÿคต๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ Hey, the website is not working! The menu is not opening anymore!

๐Ÿ™†๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ What!? I didn't change anything!

So he sets to debug the issue and finds out that while he was adding the new button he introduced a regression that broke the menu in a page that he didn't even know existed and that it was using the Menu component.

He fixes it and his boss ๐Ÿคต๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ thanks him for his hard work.

๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป Wait! What if my boss calls me up again to change the Menu component? There has has to be a better way of extending the Menu component without introducing regressions.

Does this story feel familiar to you? If so, you're not alone. I've been there too! Let's see how we can improve the Menu component to make it more flexible and avoid introducing regressions applying separation of concerns with the Compound Componet pattern.

Let's take a look at the Menu component that Tom ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ป built:

<Menu
  buttonLabel={loggedIn ? 'Signed in as Tom - Menu' : 'Unlogged - Menu'}
  isAdmin={isAdmin}
  items={menuItems}
/>

It has a few problems:

  1. It also doesn't allow you to customize the menu items rendering logic.
  2. It's now linked to implementation details. We want the Menu component to be generic, we want to use it for other purposes as well. So when extending it for a new use-case we have to make sure that we don't break the existing ones.

This is the golden example of how you'd go about using the above component if it were using the Compound Component pattern:

<Menu>
  <MenuButton>
    {loggedIn ? 'Signed in as Tom - Menu' : 'Unlogged - Menu'}
  </MenuButton>

  <MenuList>
    <MenuItem>Item 1</MenuItem>
    <MenuItem>Item 2</MenuItem>
    {isAdmin && <MenuItem>Admin</MenuItem>}
  </MenuList>
</Menu>

The Menu component is the parent component that holds the state of the menu and passes it down to its children. The MenuButton and MenuItem consume the state and render accordingly. One obvious benefit of this is that it gives you control on what pieces of the Menu to render and where to render them.

You could, for example, skip the button alltogether and make it so firing an action toggles on the Menu:

<Menu>
  <LoginDialogWithMenuToggle />

  <MenuList>
    <MenuItem>Protected action 1</MenuItem>
    <MenuItem>Protected action 2</MenuItem>
    <MenuItem>Protected action 3</MenuItem>
  </MenuList>
</Menu>

It was as simple as changing that single line of code and we were able to extend the Menu component to support a new use-case.

But what is going on under the hood? How does the LoginDialogWithMenuToggle component know how to trigger the state?

The answer is the React.Children API and the cloneElement method. Here's how it might work (don't give the code too much thought):

function Menu({ children }) {
  const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = React.useState(false)

  const toggleMenu = () => setIsOpen(!isOpen)

  const childrenWithProps = React.Children.map(children, (child) => {
    if (React.isValidElement(child)) {
      return React.cloneElement(child, { isOpen, toggleMenu })
    }

    return child
  })

  return <div>{childrenWithProps}</div>
}

function MenuList({ children, isOpen }) {
  return isOpen ? <div>{children}</div> : null
}

In this case, Menu is going through all of its direct children and cloning them to pass them down the isOpen and toggleMenu props.

This sounds great initially but it leads you to write fragile code. To illustrate that, imagine you had to put a wrapper between Menu and MenuList:

<Menu>
  <MenuButton>Where is my list? :( </MenuButton>

  <div>
    <MenuList>
      <MenuItem>Item 1</MenuItem>
      <MenuItem>Item 2</MenuItem>
      <MenuItem>Item 3</MenuItem>
    </MenuList>
  </div>
</Menu>

Now the Menu component won't be able to pass down the props to the MenuList because it's not a direct child anymore. We have the entire functionality of Menu broken because it is tight to an implementation detail that it can't enforce.

To fix this, we need to be flexible about where we put the elements in the tree!

Note: The Compound Component pattern as described here is not encouraged anymore due to the API it uses are fragile as shown above. Going forward you should only be using the Flexible Compound Component pattern we'll see now.

Flexible Compound Component

This pattern works by enhancing the Compound Component pattern by using the React Context API to pass down the state to its children anywhere in the tree. To the developer implementing a Flexible Compound Component, it's exactly like very similar to the component we've seen so far:

<Menu>
  <MenuButton>I toggle the collapsable menu! :)</MenuButton>

  <div>
    <MenuList>
      <MenuItem>Item 1</MenuItem>
      <MenuItem>Item 2</MenuItem>
      <MenuItem>Item 3</MenuItem>
    </MenuList>
  </div>
</Menu>

But internally the Menu component is now exposing its state via React Context:

const MenuContext = React.createContext()

function Menu({ children }) {
  const state = React.useState(false)

  return (
    <MenuContext.Provider value={state}>
      <div>{children}</div>
    </MenuContext.Provider>
  )
}

function MenuButton({ children }) {
  const [, setIsOpen] = React.useContext(MenuContext)

  const toggle = () => setIsOpen((isOpen) => !isOpen)

  return <button onClick={toggle}>{children}</button>
}

function MenuList({ children }) {
  const [isOpen] = React.useContext(MenuContext)
  return isOpen ? <div>{children}</div> : null
}

We can see that now, we're not limited to the direct children of Menu to consume the state. We can put the MenuButton anywhere in the tree and it will still be able to toggle the Menu.

Conclusion

Learn moreDid you have a dรฉja vรบ with this pattern?

This pattern is not only a React thing. Behold the option/select DOM elemets:

<select className="...">
  <option disabled>Option 1</option>
  <option selected>Option 2</option>
</select>

Or the magnificient details/summary elements that are used to create collapsables (this very collapsable is using those elements ๐Ÿคซ):

<details>
  <summary>Click me!</summary>
  <p>Some hidden content</p>
</details>

Its amazing that we're able to apply this pattern in React and make it even more flexible with shared state.

Overall this API is way more flexible ๐Ÿ’ช. The Compound Component pattern allowed us to compose our Menu component to fit our needs. We can also extend our Menu family of components in a variety of different ways. Got a new use-case? Just add a new component to the family and you're good to go!

We've just covered how the Compound Component pattern gives us the ability to extract and the Flexible Compound Component pattern gives us . But there's still plenty of room for improvement. Let's see how we can scale-up this API and optimize it for performance in the next article.